Mario Party 4
Richard finds himself lacking in party spirit with Mario's latest outing.
Related
Whenever I read comments that Nintendo is too cute or too kiddy I normally just dismiss them as the illiterate idiotic rantings of a forum poster who hasn't had their Ritalin dose for the day. Certainly most Nintendo games are somewhat colourful but we forgive them for it because they also happen to make the best games in the world. Mario Party 4 has the requisite credentials with all the cast of usual suspects and that illustrious Nintendo 'seal of quality' stamped on the box. After about an hour of playing it though it was a case of the Emporer's new clothes. I was going to need something a lot stronger than Ritalin. Now I am not a religious man but I pray to the gaming Gods that Nintendo see the light and never release this kind of Crayola coloured crap again.
The first title in the series came out years ago for the N64 and while at the time multiplayer gaming wasn't totally new it was in its infancy. Since then multiplayer gaming is seen as a much more important aspect for games and many developers put considerable effort into titles in this regard. Mario Party 4 hasn't really moved with the times and comes across as a tired product. Mario Party 4 purports to be a fun game for one to four players, it is not. In it you choose a character and then take turns on a virtual board game to collect stars. At the beginning of each turn you roll a virtual dice and then move around the squares, landing on various bonuses that might help or hinder you. Along the way you can pick up gold coins, mushroom bonuses and magic lamps, plus a large number of squares will trigger random events like leaping to another player’s position. At the end of every turn you will then play one of the fifty mini-games to win money. Somewhere in amongst that there is 'mega-fun' to be found but I didn't find any, and neither did the other people playing with me.
The mini-games are probably best likened to those free internet 'flash' or 'java' games but with better graphics. They are very simple, often consisting of little more than timing a button press or a little running around. While those types of games are often quite fun they have very short term appeal and are certainly not something you'd want to spend a lot of money on. The games here vary from being played as either three versus one, two versus two or every one for them self. The better games involve a little bit of skill, such as you when you all ski down a slope, trying to escape an avalanche whilst avoiding the rocks. The mediocre ones tend to just be button bashing and are mostly forgettable. The worst involve pure chance, like when you take it in turns to push a plunger and if you're lucky you won't get blown up. Each of these mini-games is chosen at random at the end of every round.
Randomness in fact plays far too big a part in the proceedings. Every turn starts with a random roll of the dice. Squares can offer random bonuses. At junctions on the board your path is chosen at random. Little lottery games offer a random chance of winning random prizes. The list goes on. Even gambling leaves less to luck than this game. So winning the board game by collecting the most stars is, you guessed it, a bit random. One thing is consistent though, the entire game is consistently sllloowwww.

Comments
Kiss my shiny metal ass!
Right...
hello
Well, when I first played Mario Party, I thought like you but after meeting the "right people" to play it with, this game is a blast! It is like a monopoly game. It plays slow but that's ok because there's never any rush playing it. You're with your friends having a good time and there's no reason. (All the aforementionned friends are 30yo and plus btw). That said, I agree that there is too much of a luck factor in this game. The only game that is a bigger blast (with these same friends) is Mario Kart.
i hate mario
Wasn't this game released over 6 months ago? That's when I remember getting it. I agree with Franck though. My first impressions of the game weren't exactly great. I considered returning it but didn't. Then a few days later some friends were over and we got drunk and after a few rounds of Timesplitters I put MP4 on "for a laugh" and suddenly there was a whole new dimension to the game. Once you get into it this game is great and 6 months on I'm still playing it when friends are over (we don't even have to be drunk now). 50% is a bit too low in my opinion, it's more of a 75-80% game.
I played the multiplayer at a friends, having never played a previous version and I quite enjoyed it. However, I would say that the boardgame element is too slow. There are often pointlessly long movie sequences where you might see a genie come out of a bottle or something. It damages the flow quite badly.
But, 50% is harsh, I'm with Chris - 75-80%.
it is cool
when dose mario party 5 come out
I THANK THAT YALL ARE IDOTS FOR MAKING GAMES BITCH ASS PEOPLE
yeahh me too